Native and cross-platform apps for iOS and Android. We build in React Native when one codebase for both stores makes sense, and natively in Swift or Kotlin when a platform-specific build is worth the extra effort.
The first question to settle is whether you need an app at all. A responsive website covers a lot of cases for a fraction of the cost, with no store review to wait for. When an app really is the right answer, because you need push notifications, offline use, hardware access or something people open every day, that's what we build.
One brief, both platforms. We take the app all the way through store submission, so you're not handed a build file and left to deal with review. First rejections are usually about metadata and privacy declarations, not code.
Store requirements change, and a build that passed review last year might not pass this year. Submission stays part of our scope, so it never becomes your problem after handover.
React Native lets you ship to both stores from a single codebase, which is usually the right economics for a first release. It isn't always right, though. If your app leans heavily on platform-specific hardware or animation, we'll say so and build native.
The trade-off is that React Native handles most of what typical apps need for considerably less than two separate native builds, and the remaining edge cases are where it gets awkward. Working out which side of that line your app sits on is what the discovery stage is for.
Apps that move money have a higher bar: session handling, encryption at rest and an audit trail that holds up. We design the database behind them together with the app, from the start.
Regulatory expectations vary by market and by what the app does with money, so scoping starts there, before any screens. Getting the data model and audit trail right at the start costs far less than adding them later.
Live location, order status that has to stay consistent across three parties at once, and offline handling that doesn't lose a job when a rider goes through a tunnel. The screens are rarely the hard part.
Keeping customer, rider and dispatcher in sync is the real challenge, and it's a database problem before it's an interface problem. That's why we design the data model and the app together.
Every project goes through the same five stages (discovery, design, development, testing and deployment), so you always know where things stand. As a guide, a simple website takes about two weeks, web apps three to four weeks, mobile apps one to three months, and custom CRM or ERP systems two to four months. The exact timeline is agreed in writing before work starts.
You deal with one point of contact and get a progress update every day. At handover we deploy the product, set it up, and give you your accounts, your data and a user guide. We keep the source code, and every agreement says so. There's more on how we work on the about page, and the full toolset is on our tech stack page.
For a first release, React Native is usually the right call: one codebase, both stores, and a noticeably lower build cost. Native Swift or Kotlin is worth it when the app depends on platform-specific hardware, heavy animation or background behaviour. We'll tell you which applies to yours.
Yes. We take the app through store submission instead of just handing over a build file. First rejections are usually about metadata and privacy declarations, which are easier to get right when submission is part of the build.
Often, yes. It depends on how the existing code is structured and how much of it is worth keeping. We'll look at it first and give you an honest answer, even if that answer is that rebuilding would cost less than rescuing it.
Tell us what you're trying to build. We'll set up a requirements session and come back with the scope, our approach, a fixed quote and a realistic timeline. If this isn't quite the right fit, you can see all seven services.